GEO

Machine & Agent Access

Technical

Independent Analysis
Effort: low
Volume: high
Under watch

Myth:Publishing llms.txt is required to be discoverable by AI assistants.

Evidence:No major generative engine has publicly confirmed reading llms.txt for retrieval or citation as of mid-2026. It is a proposed convention (llmstxt.org), not an announced ranking or ingestion signal.

The Nuance

Cheap to ship (a static file); useful as a machine-readable index for MCP clients and custom GPTs pointed at your site. Treat as inventory, not as SEO.

The Receipt

GEO Cheat Sheet research ledger

GEO Cheat Sheet · Independent Analysis

Impact3/10
Consensus3/10
Evidence70/100

Channels: chatgpt · claude · perplexity

Related Cribs

Machine & Agent Access

Technical

Under watch

Myth:Serving a `.md` version of every page gets you cited more by Claude and custom GPTs.

Evidence:Some assistants (Claude with fetched URLs, Custom GPTs, MCP clients) parse markdown more cleanly than HTML, and .md endpoints reduce token cost when an agent retrieves your page. Direct citation lift is unproven in independent tests.

Impact4/10
Consensus4/10

Machine & Agent Access

Technical

Under watch

Myth:Serving a hidden machine-only feed to AI crawlers boosts your citation share.

Evidence:Cloaking content specifically for AI crawlers — showing bots material the human page does not contain — risks the same spam classification as classic SEO cloaking. Neither Google nor OpenAI has endorsed the practice.

Impact2/10
Consensus2/10

Machine & Agent Access

Content

Myth:Publishing an llms.txt file makes your site discoverable to LLMs.

Evidence:No major LLM crawler reads llms.txt. It is a signaling gesture, not a technical requirement.

Impact1.5/10
Consensus0.5/10

Entity & E-E-A-T

Content

Myth:Rewriting competitor content is enough.

Evidence:For AI Overviews, mostly true: cited pages were statistically indistinguishable from uncited ranking pages on originality (medians 52 vs 55.5, p=.07) across 793 measured AI citations - AIO citation rides on Google rank, not information gain.

Impact9.4/10
Consensus8.4/10

Structure & Schema

Content

Myth:Aggregated round-ups can rank in AI answers.

Evidence:In most consumer verticals they dominate: 80% of CPG/retail AI answers cite at least one neutral reviewer or aggregator (Foglift 2026 benchmark - 375 buyer-intent responses, 25 verticals, 5 engines). The exception is tech SaaS, where vendor first-party content is cited 92.7% of the time.

Impact9.1/10
Consensus8.1/10

Crib of the Week

One crib in your inbox every Monday. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.